Research Article

Couples under One Roof: A Quantitative Analysis on Cohabitation and Relationship Dynamics

Authors

Abstract

Cohabitation, defined as two individuals living together without marriage, is increasingly prevalent, particularly in the Philippines. This study employs a quantitative research methodology to analyze the relationship dynamics of cohabiting couples in General Santos City. Utilizing a descriptive correlation design, data were collected from 60 randomly selected cohabiting couples through adapted survey questionnaires. The study explores how cohabitation impacts relationship satisfaction and stability, addressing questions regarding various cohabitation statuses and their influence on relationship dynamics. Results indicate that cohabiting couples report high satisfaction levels, with an aggregated mean score of 3.58, suggesting that their experiences are comparable to those of married couples. Furthermore, a significant positive correlation (r = 0.323**) was found between cohabitation status and relationship dynamics (p = 0.000), indicating that while cohabitation is not the sole determinant of relationship quality, it significantly shapes couple interactions and support mechanisms. The findings align with existing literature highlighting the dual nature of cohabitation; while it can enhance intimacy and shared experiences, it also introduces challenges related to commitment and shared responsibilities. The study concludes that understanding the complexities of cohabitation is essential for promoting relationship stability among couples. Recommendations for future research include exploring factors contributing to initial satisfaction levels and developing community support programs tailored for cohabiting couples to enhance their long-term relationship quality.

Keywords:

Cohabitation Couples Quantitative Analysis Relationship Dynamics

Article information

Journal

Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science

Volume (Issue)

1(3), (2024)

Pages

38-44

Published

08-12-2024

How to Cite

Akmad, A., & Abatayo, A. V. L. (2024). Couples under One Roof: A Quantitative Analysis on Cohabitation and Relationship Dynamics. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 1(3), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v1i3.162

References

Bejanyan, K., Marshall, T. C., & Ferenczi, N. (2015). Associations of collectivism with relationship commitment, passion, and mate preferences: Opposing roles of parental influence and family allocentrism. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0117374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117374

Brown, S. L., Manning, W. D., & Stykes, J. B. (2015). Family Structure and Child Well-being: Integrating Family Complexity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 177–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24582799

Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children’s Family Contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54(1), 29–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2584631

Del Valle, V. (2024). Mastering communication in relationships: Essential skills for stronger connections. Wellness & Co. Counselling & Psychology. Retrieved from https://wellnessandco.com.au/blog/communication-and-relationships

Foran, H. M., Mueller, J., Schulz, W., & Hahlweg, K. (2022). Cohabitation, relationship stability, relationship adjustment, and children's mental health over 10 years. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 746306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.746306

Geiger, A. W., & Livingston, G. (2019). 8 facts about love and marriage in America. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/02/13/8-facts-about-love-and-marriage

General Santos City Government. (n.d.). About General Santos City. Retrieved from https://www.gensantos.gov.ph/about/

Gonzalez, K., & Goesling, B. (2022). Relationship dynamics among unmarried couples: Findings from a study of healthy marriage and relationship education programs (OPRE Report No. 2022-318). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/report/relationship-dynamics-among-unmarried-couples-findings-study-healthy-marriage

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316

Ishizuka, P. (2018). The Economic Foundations of Cohabiting Couples’ Union Transitions. Demography, 55(2), 535–557. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45047958

Kamp Dush, C. M., & Padgett, J. E. (2021). Cohabitation and relationship adjustment: A longitudinal analysis of young adults' experiences. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(3), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056438

Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2008). Cohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19, 1663-1692. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.47

Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00189.x

Marcén, M., & Morales, M. (2017). Remain single or live together: Does culture matter? MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 77623. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77623/1/MPRA_paper_77623.pdf

McClain, L., & Brown, S. L. (2017). The roles of fathers’ involvement and co-parenting in relationship quality among cohabiting and married parents. Sex Roles, 76(5-6), 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0612-3

Noor, S., Tajik, O., Golzar, J. (2020). Simple random sampling: Introduction and application. International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1(2), 78-82. Retrieved from https://www.ijels.net/article_162982_c72b367615dfd1f4d7bd9d4ff60cbef6.pdf

Orbuch, T. L. (2015). Attraction and interpersonal relationships. In Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 339–362). Handbook of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-x_14

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2021). 2020 Census of Population and Housing. Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/content/2020-census-population-and-housing

Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827

Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). Couples' reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08324388

Rosenfeld, M. J., & Roesler, K. (2019). Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution: A longitudinal study of young adults in romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(5), 1034-1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12530

Sassler, S., & Cooperstock, A. (2023). The various roles of cohabitation in the United States. In The Oxford Handbook of Family Policy Over The Life Course (pp. 388-418). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197518151.013.19

Sassler, S., & Lichter, D. T. (2020). Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union‐formation patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12617

Stanley, S. M., Amato, P. R., Johnson, C. A., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Premarital education, marital quality, and marital stability: Findings from a large, random household survey. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.117

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119

Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541-542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18

Downloads

Views

189

Downloads

29