Article section
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Natural Resource Management Policy: A Case Study of Mwami Muzuma National Forest in Pemba District
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of Natural Resource Management Policy as a case of Mwami Muzuma National Forest in Pemba District. The forest plays a crucial role in preserving biodiversity and providing ecosystem services, which are vital for livelihoods of surrounding communities. However, increasing pressures from human activities and climate change pose significant threats to its sustainability. A descriptive research design was used and purposive sampling and Proportionate samples were drawn from the fifteen (15) forest officers and thirty five (35) local community members using systematic random sampling giving the sample of fifty (50). Focus group discussions and structured questionnaires was used to collect data. This data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) computer software in order to come up with relevant information. Understanding and improving management practices are imperative to address these challenges. The introduction of the Environmental Management Act and the establishment of the Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA) underscore the government's commitment to environmental protection. These policies emphasize the importance of environmental impact assessments, sustainable land use practices, and community involvement in resource management.
Keywords:
Biodiversity Deforestation Ecosystem Mwami Muzuma Policy Socio-Economic
Article information
Journal
Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science
Volume (Issue)
2(2), (2025)
Pages
277-284
Published
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 Inambao Mubitelela, Kelvin Chibomba (Author)
Open access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Alves, H. (2022). In Brazilian Amazon, Indigenous lands stop deforestation and boost recovery. Mongabay.
Carter, N. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
Chanda, C. T., Phiri, A., Kalasa, S., & Chitondo, L. (2024). Zambia, a country with rich mineral resources and arable land yet poor. International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, 11(1), 1-15.
Coomes, D. (2015). Environmental Research.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2021). Remote Sensing Survey.
GRZ. (2020). The Environmental Protection Act, No. 12 of 2020. Lusaka: Government Printer.
Kabir, S. (2016). Methods of data collection. In Basic Guidelines for Research: An Introductory Approach for All Disciplines (pp. 201-275; ed. 1st; chapter. 9). Book Zone Publication, Chittagong-4203, Bangladesh.
McCombes, S. (2019). Descriptive Research Definition, Types, Methods and Examples. Scribbr.
Oribhabor, C. B., & Anyanwu, C. A. (2019). Research sampling and sample size determination: a practical application. Journal of Educational Research (Fudjer), 2(1), 47-57.
Slingenberg, A., Braat, L., Van Der Windt, H., Rademaekers, K., Eichler, L., & Turner, K. (2009). Study on understanding the causes of biodiversity loss and the policy assessment framework. Framework, 54, 1-206.
Tombari, B., Gbidum, G. B., & Joy, S. K. (2021). Deforestation: human causes, consequences and possible solution. Journal of Geographical Research, 4(2), 22-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jgr.v4i2.3059
Vinz, S. (2022). What is a Theoretical Framework/Guide to Organizing. Scribbr.
Willie, M. M. (2024). Population and target population in research methodology. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 4(1), 75-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v4i1.405