Research Article

Biodiversity Conservation: An Examination on Environmental Conservation Within the Communities of Chongwe District

Authors

  • Willah Nampasa Department of Humanities, Information and Communications University, Lusaka, Zambia

    wnampasa@gmail.com

  • Kelvin Chibomba Department of Humanities, Information and Communications University, Lusaka, Zambia

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine environmental conservation within communities under biodiversity conservation. The general objective of the study was to examine environmental conservation within rural communities. The specific objectives include examining knowledge levels of rural communities on environmental conservation; establishing the effectiveness of strategies used by communities on environmental conservation; ascertaining how government policy engages with the community on environmental conservation and evaluating the effectiveness of mitigation measures on environmental conservation by rural communities. A descriptive case study approach was adopted to match the nature of the topic. The study used open ended questionnaires and guided oral interviews. In this research, the target population was 100 participants of which 60 were community members and 40 were policy makers. A random sampling of respondents was used to pick the respondents. In this study, the sample size of 100 respondents was be targeted using purposive sampling. The main instruments used are questionnaires and personal interviews. The questionnaires comprised closed and open-ended questions. Questionnaires were administered or handed out to the respondents depending on their business operating schedules. Qualitative and quantitative data analysis was done. Quantitative data was used because it was easier to present using tables and qualitative data helped express the data collected. The data collected was analyzed using tables and figures. For the qualitative data, the descriptive method was used, while for quantitative data analysis was done using Microsoft Word and Excel to generate tables and other graphic illustrations. The results showed that 37.5% of participants had a high knowledge level, and an equal percentage of participants exhibited moderate knowledge level. Meanwhile, 25% of the participants had low knowledge level. With regards to how effective the strategies used by communities on environmental conservation, it was found that there is a significant relationship between the conservation strategy used by the communities and their perceived effectiveness. To find out how government engages the community on environmental conservation we first had to find out how many participants were aware of the government policy regarding the topic and it was discovered that 65% of the participants were aware suggesting that a significant portion of the community were informed about the policy. The distribution on how effective the mitigation measures are in environmental conservation reviewed a mixed perception among the participants, with a relatively balanced view between those who see the measures as effective and those who do not. Based on the findings it was recommended that continued engagement of the communities should be maintained. High level government actors must be in attendance of Community meetings to bring about key government decisions.

Keywords:

Biodiversity Conservation Communities Environmental Conservation Examination on Environmental

Article information

Journal

Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science

Volume (Issue)

2(2), (2025)

Pages

11-20

Published

05-05-2025

How to Cite

Nampasa, W., & Chibomba, K. (2025). Biodiversity Conservation: An Examination on Environmental Conservation Within the Communities of Chongwe District. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 2(2), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v2i2.421

References

Abraham, C., & Sheeran, P. (2005). The health belief model. Predicting health behaviour, 2(1), 28-80.

Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(1), 14-25.

Bullard, R. D., Johnson, G. S., & Torres, A. O. (2011). Environmental health and racial equity in the United States: building environmentally just, sustainable, and livable communities. American Public Health Association.

Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions US households can take to curb climate change. Environment: science and policy for sustainable development, 50(5), 12-25.

Gifford, R. (2017). Place attachment enhances psychological need satisfaction. Environment and Behaviour, 49(4), 359-389.

Gukurume, S. (2014). Climate change variability and Sustainable Agriculture in Zimbabwe’ rural communities. Russian Journal of Agriculture and Socio-Economic Sciences, 2(14), 89–100.

Hellmuth, M. E., Moorhead, A., & Williams, J. (2007). Climate risk management in Africa: Learning from practice (pp. 23-35)

IPCC. 2(007). Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/wg2/

IPCC. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change Adaptation. In C. B., Barros V, Stocker T.F, Qin D, Dokken D. J., Ebi K. L., et al (Eds.), A Special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.

Karlin, B., Davis, N., Sanguinetti, A., Gamble, K., Kirkby, D., & Stokols, D. (2014). Dimensions of conservation: Exploring differences among energy behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 46(4), 423-452.

Levine, A. S., & Kline, R. (2017). A new approach for evaluating climate change communication. Climatic Change, 142, 301-309.

Mugambiwa, S. S., & Tirivangasi, H. M. (2017). Climate change: A threat towards achieving ‘Sustainable Development Goal number two’(end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture) in South Africa. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 9(1), 1-6.

Mushore, T. D., Mudavanhu, C., & Makovere, T. (2013). Effectiveness of Drought Mitigation Strategies in Bikita District, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 1(4), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130104.19

Ofoegbu, C., Chirwa, P., Francis, J., & Babalola, F. (2015, September). Understanding forest-based livelihood practices as a climate change mitigation and adaptation option in Vhembe Districts of South Africa. In XIV world forestry congress, Durban, South Africa (pp. 7-11).

Ostrom, D., Dolsak, S., & Weber. (2012). The drama of the Commons. National Research Council, Washington Dc, 2002.

Pearson, A. R., Schuldt, J. P., & Romero-Canyas, R. (2016). Social climate science: A new vista for psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 632-650.

Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of economic psychology, 24(1), 49-64.

Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(4), 327-339.

Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and behavior, 34(3), 335-362.

Swim, J. K., Clayton, S., & Howard, G. S. (2011). Human behavioral contributions to climate change: psychological and contextual drivers. American Psychologist, 66(4), 251.

Turpie, J., & Visser, M. (2013). The impact of climate change on South Africa’s rural areas. Submission for the, 14, 100-162.

Van Vugt, M., Griskevicius, V., & Schultz, P. W. (2014). Naturally green: Harnessing stone age psychological biases to foster environmental behavior. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8(1), 1-32.

Wuebbles, D., Easterling, D. R., Hayhoe, K., Knutson, T., Kopp, R., Kossin, J., ... & Wehner, M. (2016). Our globally changing climate. In Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment (Volume I, pp. 35-72).

Downloads

Views

24

Downloads

5