Article section

Article title
Contributor
Abstract
About article
DOI
Citation style
Copyright
Open access
References
Research Article

Collective Sensemaking: A Cultural-Sociological and Psychological Study of Occupational Risk

Authors

Abstract

This work explores how individuals in risks groups use multiple approaches to understand their risks, integrating cultural-sociological and psychological views. Workers’ interpretations, actions and reactions to unpredictable risks are just as important in defining occupational risk as the hazards they encounter. To understand the effect of collective meanings on risk perception and decisions, this study makes use of case studies, insights from anthropology and psychological theory. It shows how different cultural norms, workplace rules, emotions and identity are involved in defining what risks mean and in how they are coped with in various careers, including both hazardous occupations and desk jobs. It concludes that, to be successful, risk management should take into account these kinds of interpretations, rather than stop at specialist assessments of risks. Such an approach helps us see how workplace risks are shaped, managed and sometimes modified by groups of people.

Keywords:

Collective Sensemaking Cultural Sociology Occupational Risk Organizational Culture Risk Perception Workplace Psychology

Article information

Journal

Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science

Volume (Issue)

2(2), (2025)

Pages

104-111

Published

03-06-2025

How to Cite

Holt, K. L. (2025). Collective Sensemaking: A Cultural-Sociological and Psychological Study of Occupational Risk. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 2(2), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v2i2.631

References

Anagnostopoulos, D., & Rutledge, S. A. (2007). Making sense of school sanctioning policies in urban high schoo ls. Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1261-1302. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900505

Azevedo, G. (2020). Does organizational nonsense make sense? Laughing and learning from French corporate cultures. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(4), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618813203

Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., & Sengers, P. (2007). How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.016

Cloutier, C., & Langley, A. (2013). The logic of institutional logics: Insights from French pragmatist sociology. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(4), 360-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492612469057

Day, M. J. (2023). Towards ethical Artificial Intelligence in universities: ChatGPT, culture, and mental health stigmas in Asian Higher Education post COVID-19. Journal of Technology in Counselor Education and Supervision, 4(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.61888/2692-4129.1097

Dromi, S. M. (2012, December). Penny for Your Thoughts: Beggars and the Exercise of Morality in Daily Life 1. In Sociological forum (Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 847-871). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01359.x

Harambam, J. (2020). Contemporary conspiracy culture: Truth and knowledge in an era of epistemic instability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429327605

Holt, K. L. (2025). The Social Psychology of Safety: Leadership, Compliance and Behavior in High Risk Workplaces. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 2(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v2i2.584

Kerr, C., Farrukh, C., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2013). Key principles for developing industrially relevant strategic technology management toolkits. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(6), 1050-1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.006

Lizardo, O. (2017). Improving cultural analysis: Considering personal culture in its declarative and nondeclarative modes. American Sociological Review, 82(1), 88-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224166751

Lizardo, O., Mowry, R., Sepulvado, B., Stoltz, D. S., Taylor, M. A., Van Ness, J., & Wood, M. (2016). What are dual process models? Implications for cultural analysis in sociology. Sociological Theory, 34(4), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275116675900

Luhtakallio, E., & Eranti, V. (2024). Conclusions: Cultures of Doing Society. In Youth Participation and Democracy (pp. 159-171). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529239355.ch009

Shadnam, M. (2015). Theorizing morality in context. International Review of Sociology, 25(3), 456-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2015.1050309

Vaisey, S., & Valentino, L. (2018). Culture and choice: Toward integrating cultural sociology with the judgment and decision-making sciences. Poetics, 68, 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.03.002

Voyer, A., & Barker, V. (2025). Recognition Gaps and COVID Inequality: The Case of Immigrants in Sweden. Cultural Sociology, 19(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755231170700

Wigfield, C. (2020). Understanding Healthcare Professionals' Identification When Working Within A Stigmatized Organisation (Doctoral dissertation). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.49924

Xu, B., & Lo, M. C. M. (2022). Toward a cultural sociology of disaster: Introduction. Poetics, 93, 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101682

Zhang, X. (2024). Roles of crisis memory narratives in public health crisis responses: An experimental study based on the stimulus-organism-response theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 36(1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2023.2236738

Zhang, X., Nekmat, E., & Chen, A. (2020). Crisis collective memory making on social media: A case study of three Chinese crises on Weibo. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101960

Downloads

Views

60

Downloads

20