Research Article

The Petriarchal Turn: Reassembling Domestic Life and Multispecies Families through Petriarchy on AI-Driven Platforms

Authors

Abstract

This conceptual article theorises the petriarchal turn: the increasing role of companion animals as nonhuman actors who reshape power, care, and capital in platform-mediated domestic life. Drawing on Actor–Network Theory (Latour, Callon and Law), Bourdieu’s theory of capitals, and Haraway’s companionship, the article introduces petriarchy as a conceptual research tool for analysing how pets organise household routines while generating, accumulating, and converting economic, social, cultural, and symbolic capital through social media platforms. Methodologically, it advances a theoretical framework, illustrated through vignettes from digital pet cultures such as petfluencers, which highlight how leads, feeds, algorithms, and veterinary protocols, to name but a few, enrol humans and animals alike into value-producing actor networks. Pets are described as obligatory passage points within domestic assemblages, reconfiguring schedules, spatial arrangements, and affective labour, while social media platforms translate their cuteness and care into visibility and revenue. These processes redistribute authority and resources within families, intersecting with class and gender, as access to breeds, training, time, and platform literacy determines who can capitalise on nonhuman charisma, a traditionally human attribute. The article argues that the contemporary family should be reframed as a multispecies, digitally AI-mediated, capital converting assemblage. It then proposes testable propositions for empirical research on platform pet economies and calls for a critical agenda that recognises both the agency and vulnerability of animals mediated online.

Keywords:

AI-driven Platforms Digital Care Economies Domestic Life Multispecies Families Petriarchy Pets Social Media

Article information

Journal

Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science

Volume (Issue)

2(3), (2025)

Pages

10-25

Published

05-09-2025

How to Cite

Day, M. J. (2025). The Petriarchal Turn: Reassembling Domestic Life and Multispecies Families through Petriarchy on AI-Driven Platforms. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 2(3), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v2i3.945

References

Adams, C. J. (1990). The sexual politics of meat. Bloomsbury.

Akrich, M. (1992). The de-description of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). MIT Press.

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage.

Arseneault, J., & Collard, R.-C. (2023). Crimes against reproduction: Domesticating life in animals. Humanimalia, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.11727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.11727

Bender, K. (2025, February 26). Dog influencer Doug the Pug receives ‘truly unique’ honorary degree in unexpected field (exclusive). People. https://people.com/doug-the-pug-receives-unique-honorary-degree-11741828

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

Birke, L. (1994). Feminism, animals and science. Open University Press.

Brooks, H., Rushton, K., Walker, S., Lovell, K., & Rogers, A. (2016). Ontological security and connectivity provided by pets: A study in the self-management of the everyday lives of people diagnosed with a long-term mental health condition. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 409. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1111-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1111-3

Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x

Caple, H. (2019). Lucy says today she is a Labradoodle: How the dogs-of-Instagram reveal voter preferences. Social Semiotics, 29(4), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1443582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1443582

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2024, October). Japan’s aging society as a technological opportunity. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/10/japans-aging-society-as-a-technological-opportunity

Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W., & Curtis, S. (2008). Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & Place, 14(3), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007

Coulter, K. (2016). Animals, work, and the promise of interspecies solidarity. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137558800

Clarridge, C. (2025, June 27). TikTok helps Seattle pets find homes. Axios (Seattle). https://www.axios.com/local/seattle/2025/06/27/seattle-humane-pet-adoptions-tiktok-viral-videos

Crawford, L. (2024). The Petriarchy. Crawford Roberts Publications.

Cutt, H., Giles-Corti, B., Knuiman, M., & Pikora, T. (2008). Physical activity behaviour of dog owners: Development and reliability of the Dogs and Physical Activity (DAPA) tool. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(Suppl. 1), S73–S89. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.5.s1.s73 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.5.s1.s73

Day, M. J. (2023). Towards ethical artificial intelligence in universities: ChatGPT, culture, and mental health stigmas in Asian higher education post COVID-19. Journal of Technology in Counselor Education and Supervision, 4(1) https://doi.org/10.61888/2692-4129.1097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61888/2692-4129.1097

Day, M. J. (2024a). Re imagining library learning spaces, or risking digital piracy in universities: Students’ views on spatial boundaries, time, and self study modalities in the post digital era of artificial intelligence. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v17i1.1492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v17i1.1492

Day, M. J. (2024b). Digital divides in Chinese HE: Leveraging AI as student’s partner (AIASSP) to reduce piracy. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(1), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i1.343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i1.343

Day, M. J. (2025a). Becoming artificially intelligent: Student perspectives on AI-enabled success and guanxi in higher education. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management, 2(2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v2i2.720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v2i2.720

Day, M. J. (2025b). Digital piracy in higher education: Exploring social media users and Chinese postgraduate students motivations for supporting ‘academic cybercrime’ by shelving eBooks from Z-Library. (2025). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/90p10x24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/90p10x24

Day, M. J. & Zhang, T. (2025). Towards a sociology of third culture universities: Latourian cosmopolitics in transnational higher education. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(4), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i4.754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i4.754

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

Derrida, J. (1997). Of grammatology (Corrected ed., G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1978).

Despret, V. (2016). What would animals say if we asked the right questions? University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816692378.001.0001

Di Cioccio, M., Pozharliev, R., & De Angelis, M. (2024). Pawsitively powerful: Why and when pet influencers boost social media effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 41(7), 1614–1628. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22000

Dolan, F. (1994). Dangerous familiars: Representations of domestic crime in England (pp. 1550–1700). Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501707285

Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford University Press.

Duffy, B. E. (2017). Not getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300218176.001.0001

Fortune Business Insights. (2025). Pet services market size, share, growth. Industry report [2032]. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/pet-services-market-112460

Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Polity.

Haraway, D. J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q

Hudson, J., Ungar, R., Albright, L., Tkatch, R., Schaeffer, J., & Wicker, E. R. (2020). Robotic pet use among community-dwelling older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(9), 2018–2028. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa119

Jacobson, J., Hodson, J., & Mittelman, R. (2022). Pup-ularity contest: The advertising practices of popular animal influencers on Instagram. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 174, 121226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121226

Khalil, S. (2018, May 18). Famous dog makes ridiculous cash. News.com.au. https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/jiffpom-is-the-worlds-most-famous-and-highestearning-social-media-dog/news-story/92161a982a00d5357c1e2e18e73adf29

Kogan, L., Little, S., & Oxley, J. (2021). Dog and cat owners’ use of online Facebook groups for pet health information. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 38(3), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12351

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001

Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Blackwell.

Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.

Longmire, B. (2025, February 21). Cuddly 8-year-old cat surrendered to shelter for being ‘too affectionate’ inspires dozens of adoption applications. People. https://people.com/cat-surrendered-connecticut-shelter-too-affectionate-11684130

Low, D. S., Aung, M. T., & Day, M. J. (2020). Cognitive sociology: Developing the "diversity pathways" model in cultural neuroscience. Human Behavior, Development and Society, 21(4), 66–77. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hbds/article/view/243179

Low, D. S., McNeill, I., & Day, M. J. (2022). Endangered languages: A sociocognitive approach to language death, identity loss and preservation in the age of artificial intelligence. Sustainable Multilingualism, 21(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2022-0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2022-0011

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1772278

Maddox, J. (2021). The secret life of pet Instagram accounts: Joy, resistance, and commodification in the internet’s cute economy. New Media & Society, 23(11), 3332–3348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820956345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820956345

Morrison, R., Maust-Mohl, M., & Ferry, T. (2024). Exploring factors that influence public engagement of adoptable pets on Facebook. Animals, 14(22), 3217. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14223217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14223217

Myrick, J. (2015). Emotion regulation, procrastination, and watching cat videos online: Who watches internet cats, why, and to what effect? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.001

NBT World. (2025). The rise of the petriarchy in Thailand.Fireside EP35, YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfo7XhaFE7g.

Ngai, S. (2012). Our aesthetic categories: Zany, cute, interesting. Harvard University Press.

Real Insurance (2016, April 8). The Petriarchy – pets are becoming the new +1 across Australia. Real Insurance. https://www.realinsurance.com.au/news-views/australian-pet-survey

Rew, L. (2000). Friends and pets as companions: Strategies for coping with loneliness among homeless youth. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 13(3), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6171.2000.tb00089.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6171.2000.tb00089.x

Schneider, M., & Harley, L. (2006). How dogs influence the evaluation of psychotherapists. Anthrozoös, 19, 128–142. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279306785593784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/089279306785593784

Sherson, V. (2023, November 11). The rise of the pampered petriarchy: What pampering pets says about the owners, NZ Herald. The New Zealand Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/the-rise-of-the-pampered-petriachy/JW3WEQ53IZDQPBN2AHJ5XTYGTM/

Shukin, N. (2009). Animal capital: Rendering life in biopolitical times. University of Minnesota Press.

Tague, I. (2015). Animal companions: Pets and social change in eighteenth-century Britain. Pennsylvania State University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271067445

Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together. Basic Books.

Vandenberghe, F. (2025). Human–animal relations: The ontological turn and the return of humanism. Theory, Culture & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251351577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251351577

Vereshchagina, N., & Dushakova, I. (2025). Gendered Zootopia on Instagram: Curation of pet accounts and identity representation. Media and Communication, 13. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8784

Vitak, J., Wisniewski, P., Ashktorab, Z., & Badillo-Urquiola, K. (2017). Benefits and drawbacks of using social media to grieve following the loss of a pet. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society (SMSociety ’17). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097309

Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Blackwell.

Washington Post. (2019, May 17). Grumpy Cat has died. The internet-famous feline with the perpetually miserable mug was 7. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/05/17/grumpy-cat-an-internet-famous-feline-with-furry-perma-scowl-is-dead/

Waters, T., & Day, M. J. (2022a). Multicultural mosaic? Studying the cultural integration of international students in "Thai higher education 4.0". Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 22(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.14456/hasss.2022.13

Waters, T., & Day, M. J. (2022b). Thai menschenbild: A study of Chinese, Thai, and international students in a private Thai university as measured by the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01101-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01101-y

Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2005). The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital? Social Science & Medicine, 61(6), 1159–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.017

Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M., & Bosch, D. (2007). More than a furry companion: The ripple effect of companion animals on neighbourhood interactions and sense of community. Society and Animals, 15(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853007X169333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853007X169333

Wood, L. (Ed.). (2009). Living well together: How companion animals can help strengthen social fabric. Centre for the Built Environment and Health. University of Western Australia.

Wood, L. (2010). Community benefits of human–animal interactions: The ripple effect. In P. McCardle, S. McCune, L. Esposito, J. Griffin, & L. Freund (Eds.), The role of pets in children’s lives: Human–animal interaction in child development, health and therapeutic intervention (pp. 153–173). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Wood, L., Martin, K., Christian, H., Nathan, A., Lauritsen, C., Houghton, S., Kawachi, I., & McCune, S. (2015). The pet factor: Companion animals as a conduit for getting to know people, friendship formation and social support. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0122085. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122085

Wood, L., Martin, K., Christian, H., Houghton, S., Kawachi, I., Vallesi, S., & McCune, S. (2017). Social capital and pet ownership: A tale of four cities. SSM – Population Health, 3, 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.002

Zhang, L., Wei, W., Rathjens, B., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Pet influencers on social media: The joint effect of message appeal and narrator. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 110, 103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103453

Zimolag, U., & Krupa, T. (2009). Meaningful community occupation for people with serious mental illness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.63.2.126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.63.2.126

Downloads

Views

39

Downloads

42