Article section
Analyzing Effectiveness of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Business Growth: A Study of SMEs in the Hospitality Sector in Kitwe
Abstract
Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) has been publicized as a vital ingredient that brings incremental growth to firms. As a result, this research investigates the impact of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) on the growth of small and medium enterprises business among Zambian- owned enterprises within the Kitwe hospitality sector, with a focus on understanding the practical effectiveness of key entrepreneurial capabilities in driving business success and growth. The study’s objectives are determining innovation and marketing capabilities can contribute to growth and profitability, while analyzing the effects of entrepreneurial training and effective use of financial management can enhance growth in the industry. To address these objectives, both qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection were employed as purposive sampling method as to allow an in-depth examination of how Kitwe ‘s unique socio-cultural and economic factors shape the entrepreneurial behaviors. The research drew a purposive 50 participants including business owners, managers, and industrial stakeholders to allow for diverse representation across the sector. The sample size was determined based on the standard for achieving data saturation in qualitative research. The findings reveal that entrepreneurial training significantly enhances management skills, empowering leaders with improved decision-making abilities and strategic thinking which are paramount in a dynamic environment. Financial management was seen as an important element in optimizing resource use in the industry. Additionally, innovative capacity emerged as essential for maintaining market share and maintaining long term growth by allowing business to adapt rapidly to changing customer preferences and industrial trends, These results underscores the need for policy intervention that supports entrepreneurial development, financial literacy and innovative driven strategies to strengthen Kitwe’s hospitality sector, thereby contributing to the broader goals of economic resiliency and growth in Zambia’s entrepreneurial landscape.
Keywords:
Entrepreneurial Orientation Hospitality Industry Innovation Market Dynamics Technological Change
Article information
Journal
Journal of Economics, Business, and Commerce
Volume (Issue)
2(1), (2025)
Pages
47-58
Published
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 Joseph Nsama, Marvin Kabubi (Author)
Open access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic management journal, 10(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00110.x
Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 25(4), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500406
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 16(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
Dimitratos, P., Lioukas, S., & Carter, S. (2004). The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: the importance of domestic environment. International Business Review, 13(1), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2003.08.001
George, B. A. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation: A theoretical and empirical examination of the consequences of differing construct representations. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1291-1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01004.x
Hart, S. L. (1992). An integrative framework for strategy-making processes. Academy of management review, 17(2), 327-351. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279547
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods for meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of marketing, 62(3), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200303
Klein, P. G., & McCarthy, A. (2005). The role of organizational culture in the venture capital investment process. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 663–687.
Klyver, K. & Schenkel, M. (2013). The relationship between perceived entrepreneurial opportunity and market orientation: A study of Danish entrepreneurs. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 14(4), 277–289
Kocak, A. & Abimbola, T. (2009). The role of market orientation and entrepreneurship on firm performance: A case of emerging market firms. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 57–64.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
Mahmood, M. & Qureshi, M. I. (2010). Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 16(5), 376–393.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1986). Porter's (1980) generic strategies and performance: an empirical examination with American data: part I: testing Porter. Organization studies, 7(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068600700103
Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management science, 29(7), 770-791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
Morris, M. H., & Paul, G. W. (1987). The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms. Journal of business venturing, 2(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90012-7
Noble, C. H., Sinha, R. K., & Kumar, A. (2002). Market orientation and performance: The role of product innovation. Journal of Business Research, 55, 819–823.
O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California management review, 53(4), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Feld, T. (2000). Organizational climate and entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of organizational learning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 68–72.
Santos, J. B., & Brito, L. A. L. (2012). Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 9, 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922012000500007
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 23(3), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300302
Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Ndofor, H. (2005). Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 309-354). https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631218616.2006.00012.x
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses. Strategic management journal, 24(13), 1307-1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360
Yin, R. K. (2018). Research and applications, design and methods (6th ed).
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of business venturing, 10(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E