Article section

Article title
Contributor
Abstract
About article
DOI
Citation style
Copyright
Open access
References
Research Article

Challenges in Formal Filipino Writing Among Ninth-Grade Students in Special Programs in the Philippines

Authors

Abstract

Knowledge of formal Filipino academic writing is a constitutionally mandated competence essential for individual success and national progress. This descriptive-comparative study addresses persistent challenges faced by Grade 9 students in Special Curriculum Programs at Isabela National High School in writing formal Filipino essays. Using the Input–Process–Output (IPO) model, the research investigates the writing experiences of 231 students enrolled in Special Science, Journalism, and Arts programs. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and One-Way ANOVA to identify writing frequency, motivations, and difficulties. Findings reveal that students infrequently write Filipino essays, primarily motivated by extrinsic factors such as grades rather than intrinsic interest. Despite oral fluency, students struggle with higher-order thinking skills required for essay writing, including idea generation, logical sequencing, and structuring. Frequent writing errors involve punctuation, sentence construction, and grammar. Students express a desire to improve vocabulary and logical flow while valuing teacher and peer support as key facilitators. The study highlights discrepancies in grading practices influenced by students' low appraisal of Filipino writing and related grade inflation concerns. These challenges underscore the need for evidence-based pedagogical strategies that balance linguistic accuracy with cognitive and metacognitive development. The research advocates for equitable grading and instructional innovations that foster comprehensive Filipino language proficiency and holistic student growth within specialized academic settings. This study fills a research gap by providing empirical data to inform curriculum enhancement, teaching practices, and policy-making aimed at strengthening Filipino writing skills among high school students in specialized programs.

Keywords:

Academic Writing Filipino Essay Writing Pedagogical Strategies Special Curriculum Programs Writing Challenges

Article information

Journal

Journal of Education, Learning, and Management

Volume (Issue)

2(2), (2025)

Pages

61-73

Published

12-08-2025

How to Cite

Martinez, V. (2025). Challenges in Formal Filipino Writing Among Ninth-Grade Students in Special Programs in the Philippines. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management, 2(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v2i2.863

References

Almario, V. S. (2016). The effect of integrated language learning approach on the writing performance of Filipino learners. Philippine Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 25–40.

Alonzo, D., & Schutz, P. A. (2017). Developmental trends in writing self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 300–318.

Andrade, H., & Heritage, M. (2013). Using formative assessment to improve learning around the globe. Corwin Press.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bautista, M. L. S. (2005). The Filipino bilingual: A study of Philippine bilingualism and bilingual education. De La Salle University Press.

Baxter, J. (2014). Speaking out: Why men and women (don’t) say what they mean. John Wiley & Sons.

Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.88.4.354

Bialystok, E. (2017). Bilingualism and the brain. Cambridge University Press.

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309

Bruning, R., & Kauffman, D. (2017). Self-regulation in written language learning and instructions. In J. Dunlosky & K. A. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 465–490). Cambridge University Press.

Bruning, R., & Kauffman, D. F. (2016). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Carpina, Y. (1990). Analysis of Formal Writing in Filipino by First-Year Students of Isabela National High School.

Connor, U. (1990). Linguistics, discourse analysis, and the teaching of composition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 237–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002026

Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222

Daly, J. A., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2020). Writing apprehension: A social-cognitive perspective. Routledge.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2013). Criticality in ELT: Global and local perspectives. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 15(3), 4-34.

Gaiman, N. (2016). The view from the cheap seats: Selected non-fiction. William Morrow.

Garcia, F. (2018). Cognitive development in adolescence: Implications for academic performance. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(2), 123–145.

Gonzales, R. (2020). The frequency of Filipino use in Academic Tasks and Its Effect on the Skills of Senior High School Students. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis/Dissertation or Journal Article, depending on original source].

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2019). Writing next, revisited: What’s new in research on writing to read. Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Hebert, M. (2016). Best practices in writing instruction. Guilford Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed., revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771

Hayes, J. R. (2012). Cognitive processes in writing. In H. S. Sun & C. Bazerman (Eds.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 53–73). Routledge.

Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2015). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A meta-analytic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 60–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002

Hsu, C. L., & Wang, C. M. (2020). Exploring the relationships between writing apprehension, self-efficacy, and writing performance of EFL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100691.

Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta- analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 53-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.104.1.53

Hyon, S. (2018). Teaching second language writing: A genre-based approach. Routledge.

James, C. (2013). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An elaboration of psychological interdependence. In A. Krapp & B. Weidenmann (Eds.), Pedagogical applications of motivation psychology (pp. 29–50). Hogrefe Publishing.

Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121

Lamott, A. (2016). Bird by bird: Some instructions on writing and life. Anchor Books.

Lumbera, B. (1997). Filipino literature: A history and anthology. Anvil Publishing.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759

Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2001). Gender differences in writing self-beliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 502-512.

Piaget, J. (2019). The development of Thought.

Queen, C. (2007). Real life: The queer narrative as literary genre. In P. B. Marzluff & C. Queen (Eds.), Queer subjects: An anthology of gay and lesbian writing (pp. 11–25). University of Wisconsin Press.

Quisumbing, H. (1998). The Filipino writers and their works: A history of Philippine literature. University of the Philippines Press.

Ramos, A. (2018). Paggamit ng Teknolohiya sa Pagtuturo ng Pagsusulat sa Filipino (master’s thesis, Ateneo de Manila University). https://atheneo.edu/research/theses

Santos, L. F. (2018). Motivation in Filipino Writing of Students and Its Relationship to Academic Performance. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis/Dissertation or Journal Article, depending on original source].

Santos, L. F. (2021). Assessing the effectiveness of grammar integration in writing instructions. TESOL Quarterly, 55(4), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.1187

Santos, M. (2017). Mga Tradisyunal na Pamamaraan sa Pagtuturo ng Pagsusulat (Master’s thesis, University of Santo Tomas) UST Graduate School Thesis Repository.

Santos, R. G. (2015). Exploring the relationship between age and writing proficiency in high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 45–60.

Schraw, G. J., Bruning, R. H., & Norby, M. M. (2011). Cognitive psychology and instruction (5th ed.). Pearson.

Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter?. Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a

Smith, J. E. (2018) Re-engineering national reading policy, pedagogy, development: the case for a simple view of meaningful reading. Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 10(2), 65-79.

Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699954

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load theory. In D. Merrill (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional technology 2 (pp. 287–305). Erlbaum.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 183–197.

Tan, M. P. (2012). Language exposure and its impact on writing proficiency among Filipino students. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 43(1), 78–95.

UNESCO. (2003). UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2003). Global education digest 2003: Comparing education statistics across the world. UNESCO. https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/global-education-digest-2003-comparing-education-statistics-across-the-world-en_0.pdf

UNESCO. (2016). Education for people & planet: Creating sustainable futures for all (Global Education Monitoring Report). https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/education-people-and-planet DOI: https://doi.org/10.54676/JPTM4052

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ engagement with feedback: A systematic review and synthesis of evidence from across the disciplines. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Views

209

Downloads

71