Review Article

A Comparative Study of Religion: The Mother of All Subjects

Authors

Abstract

Although it is frequently marginalised in contemporary academic discourse, religion is actually the origin of many fundamental topics that influence modern civilisation. This essay compares and contrasts various academic fields, such as philosophy, science, art, law, ethics, and education, in order to examine religion’s function as the “mother of all subjects.” The study, which draws from a variety of religious traditions and academic viewpoints, reframes religion as the foundation for intellectual inquiry rather than as a holdover from the past. It illustrates how religious thought gave rise to systemic frameworks of knowledge and continues to influence modern human understanding through a multidisciplinary approach.

Keywords:

Comparative Analysis Foundations Justice Mother of All Subjects Multidisciplinary Religion

Article information

Journal

Journal of Exceptional Multidisciplinary Research

Volume (Issue)

2(2), (2025)

Pages

78-83

Published

07-10-2025

How to Cite

Aimiehinor, O. S. (2025). A Comparative Study of Religion: The Mother of All Subjects. Journal of Exceptional Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.69739/jemr.v2i2.1042

References

Berman, H. J. (1983). Law and revolution: The development of the legal tradition in the West. Harvard University Press.

Beyer, P. (2001). Globalisation and religion. Publications by Sage.

Ebrey, P. B. (1993). The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. Cambridge University Press.

Eliade, M. (1987). The nature of religion: The sacred and the profane (W. R. Trask, Trans). Harcourt.

Eliot, T. S. (1934). The Rock: A play about pageants. Faber and Faber.

Foucault, M. (1970). An archaeology of the human sciences: The order of things. Old books.

Goleman, D. (2003). A scientific discussion with the Dalai Lama about destructive emotions. Bantam.

Grangaard, B. R., & Noss, D. S. (2011). A History of Religions (13th ed.). Pearson.

Grant, E. (2007). From Aristotle to Copernicus, science and religion from 400 BC to 1550 AD. Press of Johns Hopkins University.

Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in public life. Journal of Philosophy in Europe, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x

Hall, D. L., & Ames, R. T. (2001). A translation and philosophical analysis of the Zhongyong that focusses on the familiar. Hawaii University Press.

Hourani, G. F. (1985). Islamic ethics combine tradition and reason. Cambridge University Press.

Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his representations. Doubleday.

Kenny, A. (2005). A fresh account of Western philosophy’s past. Oxford University Press.

Leff, G. (1992). An intellectual and institutional history of universities in Paris and Oxford in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Blackwell Wiley.

Locke, J. (2002). C. B. Macpherson (Ed.), The Second Treatise on Government. Hackett Books. (First published in 1689)

Markus, R. A. (1970). Saeculum: St. Augustine’s theology in relation to history and society. Cambridge University Press.

Moore, C. A., & Radhakrishnan, S. (Eds.). (1957). An Indian philosophy reference book. Press, Princeton University.

Nasr, S. H. (2006). Islam and science and civilisation. Harvard University Press.

Nelson, B. (1969). From tribal brotherhood to universal otherhood: The concept of usury. Chicago University Press.

Neuhaus, R. J. (1984). The naked public square: American democracy and religion. Eerdmans.

Prothero, S. (2010). What every American should and shouldn’t know about religious literacy. HarperOne.

Sells, M. A. (1996). Sufism, the Qur’an, Mi’raj, and literary and theological works are examples of early Islamic mysticism. Paulist Publishing.

Snell, D. C. (1997). Life in the Ancient Near East, 3100–332 BCE. Yale University Press.

Weber, M. (1930). The spirit of capitalism and the Protestant ethic (T. Parsons, Trans). Routledge.

Westfall, R. S. (1980). Isaac Newton’s biography: Never at rest. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Views

0

Downloads

0