Research Article

Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Framework for SDG Competencies in Higher Education

Authors

Abstract

This study looks at how university students in the Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR) of the Philippines understand and act on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Most students have heard of the SDGs, often through school programs, but awareness alone doesn’t mean they can apply the ideas. A lot of earlier research focused only on what students know or how they feel about the goals. Very little examined whether they could actually think critically, solve problems, or change their behavior in ways that support sustainability. To address this, we created the Multidimensional Sustainable Development Goal Competency Assessment Framework (MSCAF). The framework was designed to assess multidimensional competencies beyond surface-level awareness of the SDGs. The framework looks at how students process information, make decisions, and form habits linked to sustainable living, while also considering the diverse cultures in the region. The instrument was refined in stages through surveys, FGDs, and interviews. The baseline survey involved 400 students, and the instrument demonstrated robust internal consistency (Cronbach’s α range = 0.78–0.91). Construct validity was established via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFI= 0.95, RMSEA = 0.06). Subsequent qualitative improvement was followed by an intervention study involving 120 students. The study aimed to measure the effects of problem-based learning and action research activities. Finally, the study applied the framework over two school terms to measure how students developed after joining problem-based learning activities and action research projects. The results showed students didn’t just gain more facts—they became better at thinking critically, working across different fields, and choosing behaviors that help their communities and the environment. The study offers both a reliable tool for assessing SDG engagement and a teaching model that helps schools turn awareness into real, lasting change.

Keywords:

Cordillera Administrative Region Higher Education Institutions Problem-Based and Experiential Learning Student Sustainability Skills Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Article information

Journal

Journal of Exceptional Multidisciplinary Research

Volume (Issue)

2(2), (2025)

Pages

31-36

Published

21-08-2025

How to Cite

Bermudez, W. M. C. (2025). Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Framework for SDG Competencies in Higher Education. Journal of Exceptional Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.69739/jemr.v2i2.827

References

Ahamad, N. R., & Ariffin, M. (2018). Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards sustainable consumption among university students in Selangor, Malaysia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 16, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.006

Aiken, L. R. (1979). Relationships between the item difficulty and discrimination indexes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39(4), 821–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447903900415

Alm, K., Melén, M., & Aggestam-Pontoppidan, C. (2021). Advancing SDG competencies in higher education: Exploring an interdisciplinary pedagogical approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(6), 1450–1466. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0417

Alvarez-Risco, A., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S., Rosen, M. A., García-Ibarra, V., Maycotte-Felkel, S., & Martínez-Toro, G. M. (2021). Expectations and interests of university students in COVID-19 times about sustainable development goals: Evidence from Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru. Sustainability, 13(6), 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063306

Borges, F. (2019). Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning sustainable development: A study among prospective elementary teachers. Higher Education Studies, 9(2), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n2p22

Bos, N. (2020). Best practice standards for social research ethics. Journal of Social Research Practices, 12(1), 45–53.

Burton, R. F. (2001). Do item-discrimination indices really help us to improve our tests? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120052378

Considine, J., Botti, M., & Thomas, S. (2005). Design, format, validity and reliability of multiple-choice questions for use in nursing research and education. Collegian, 12(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60478-3

Cottafava, D., Cavaglià, G., & Corazza, L. (2019). Education of sustainable development goals through students’ active engagement. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(3), 521–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0152

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson.

D’Sa, J. L., & Visbal-Dionaldo, M. L. (2017). Analysis of multiple-choice questions: Item difficulty, discrimination index and distractor efficiency. International Journal of Nursing Education, 9(3), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-9357.2017.00079.4

Krathwohl, D. R., & Anderson, L. W. (2010). Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 64–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433562

Leiva-Brondo, M., Lajara-Camilleri, N., Vidal-Meló, A., Atarés, A., & Lull, C. (2022). Spanish university students’ awareness and perception of Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability literacy. Sustainability, 14(8), 4552. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084552

Nguyen, T. D., Shih, M.-H., Srivastava, D., Tirthapura, S., & Xu, B. (2021). Stratified random sampling from streaming and stored data. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 39(3), 665–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10619-020-07315-w

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Schoonenboom, J. (2022). Meta-inferences in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 3–20.

Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Schreiber, B., & Torabian, J. (2023). Student development in higher education in the era of Agenda 2030 and the UN’s SDGs: Towards SDGs 2.0. Journal of College and Character, 24(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587X.2022.2157442

Stiller, J., Hartmann, S., Mathesius, S., Straube, P., Tiemann, R., Nordmeier, V., Krüger, D., & Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2016). Assessing scientific reasoning: A comprehensive evaluation of item features that affect item difficulty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(5), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1164830

Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175612440286

Zamora-Polo, F., Sánchez-Martín, J., Corrales-Serrano, M., & Espejo-Antúnez, L. (2019). What do university students know about Sustainable Development Goals? A realistic approach to the reception of this UN program amongst the youth population. Sustainability, 11(13), 3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133533

Downloads

Views

22

Downloads

8