Research Article

Integrating Safety Engineering and Risk Management in High-Hazard Industrial Systems: A Multidisciplinary Framework for Sustainable Operations

Authors

Abstract

Such industries as chemical processing, nuclear energy, oil and gas, etc. are considered to be high hazard at best and thus require an effective safety approach in terms of their functioning. This paper discusses the lasting problem of maintaining sustainable and safe operations in those industries by introducing a cross-disciplinary framework of combining safety engineering with the holistic management of risks. The underlying methodology is a systems approach by harnessing the input of engineering and occupational health along with environmental science & human factors to preemptively determine, evaluate, and where possible reduce risks during the industrial lifecycle. Significant findings say that the combination of technical and organizational controls along with real-time safety monitoring and predictive analytics and cross-sector alignment in regulations dramatically enhances the operational reliability and safety performance. Moreover, intensive stakeholder involvement and safety culture construction are defined as the key facilitators of successful risk governance. The need to take an interdisciplinary approach to further the cause of regulatory compliance, accident prevention, and environmental and human sustainability over the long term in the high-risk industrial systems is highlighted by the proposed system.

Keywords:

High-Hazard Industrial Systems Industrial Safety Integration Multidisciplinary Framework Risk Management Safety Engineering Sustainable Operations

Article information

Journal

Scientific Journal of Engineering, and Technology

Volume (Issue)

2(1), (2025)

Pages

126-133

Published

18-06-2025

How to Cite

Holt, K. L. (2025). Integrating Safety Engineering and Risk Management in High-Hazard Industrial Systems: A Multidisciplinary Framework for Sustainable Operations. Scientific Journal of Engineering, and Technology, 2(1), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.69739/sjet.v2i1.688

References

Acharyulu, P. S., & Seetharamaiah, P. (2015). A framework for safety automation of safety-critical systems operations. Safety Science, 77, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.017

Chandrasegaran, D., Ghazilla, R. A. R., & Rich, K. (2020). Human factors engineering integration in the offshore O&G industry: A review of current state of practice. Safety science, 125, 104627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104627

Cigognetti, T., Carra, M., Ghirardi, A., Assefa, N. G., Ferretto, L., Ventura, R., ... & Barabino, B. (2024). Mega-Events: Assessing Road Safety through an Operating Framework. An Application for the Milano–Cortina 2026 Winter Olympic Games. Infrastructures, 9(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9030051

Egbumokei, P. I., Dienagha, I. N., Digitemie, W. N., Onukwulu, E. C., & Oladipo, O. T. (2024). Automation and worker safety: Balancing risks and benefits in oil, gas and renewable energy industries. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5(4), 2582-7138. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2024.5.4.1273-1283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2024.5.4.1273-1283

Ghaith, A., & Huimin, M. (2024). The theory of high hazard (HHT) based on grounded theory method and theories integration. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2023-2306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2023-2306

Griffin, M. A., Hodkiewicz, M. R., Dunster, J., Kanse, L., Parkes, K. R., Finnerty, D., ... & Unsworth, K. L. (2014). A conceptual framework and practical guide for assessing fitness-to-operate in the offshore oil and gas industry. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 68, 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.005

Harvey, E. J., Waterson, P., & Dainty, A. R. (2018). Beyond ConCA: Rethinking causality and construction accidents. Applied ergonomics, 73, 108-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.001

Hettinger, A. Z., Fairbanks, R. J., Hegde, S., Rackoff, A. S., Wreathall, J., Lewis, V. L., ... & Wears, R. L. (2013). An evidence‐based toolkit for the development of effective and sustainable root cause analysis system safety solutions. Journal of healthcare risk management, 33(2), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21122

Jin, D., & Lin, J. (2011). Managing tsunamis through early warning systems: A multidisciplinary approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, 54(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.025

Lacasse, S., Nadim, F., Lacasse, S., & Nadim, F. (2009). Landslide risk assessment and mitigation strategy. Landslides–disaster risk reduction, 31-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_3

McBean, G. A. (2009). Introduction of a new International Research Program: Integrated Research on Disaster Risk-The challenge of natural and human-induced environmental hazards. In Geophysical Hazards: Minimizing Risk, Maximizing Awareness (pp. 59-69). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3236-2_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3236-2_5

Rana, I. A., & Routray, J. K. (2018). Integrated methodology for flood risk assessment and application in urban communities of Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 91, 239-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3124-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3124-8

Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety science, 27(2-3), 183-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0

Shao, C., Yang, J., Tian, X., Ju, M., & Huang, L. (2013). Integrated environmental risk assessment and whole-process management system in chemical industry parks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(4), 1609-1630. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10041609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10041609

Sperotto, A., Torresan, S., Gallina, V., Coppola, E., Critto, A., & Marcomini, A. (2016). A multi-disciplinary approach to evaluate pluvial floods risk under changing climate: The case study of the municipality of Venice (Italy). Science of the Total Environment, 562, 1031-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.150

Swuste, P., Groeneweg, J., Van Gulijk, C., Zwaard, W., Lemkowitz, S., & Oostendorp, Y. (2020). The future of safety science. Safety science, 125, 104593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104593

Thakur, A., & Kumar, A. (2023, August). Ecotoxicity analysis and risk assessment of nanomaterials for the environmental remediation. Macromolecular Symposia, 410(1), 2100438. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.202100438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.202100438

Ugliotti, F. M., Osello, A., Daud, M., & Yilmaz, O. O. (2023). Enhancing risk analysis toward a landscape digital twin framework: A multi-hazard approach in the context of a socio-economic perspective. Sustainability, 15(16), 12429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612429

Zulkifli, A. R., Ibrahim, C. K. I. C., & Belayutham, S. (2023). A conceptual framework for facilitating the integration of information and communication data in BIM-PtD activities. In Handbook of Construction Safety, Health and Well-being in the Industry 4.0 Era (pp. 31-41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003213796-4

Downloads

Views

93

Downloads

14