Article section
Decoding the Pharmacokinetic Landscape of Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Nanoparticles have revolutionized drug delivery through enhanced targeting and regulated release. Maximizing efficacy and safety relies on an understanding of their pharmacokinetics (PK). This comprehensive review, adhering to Cochrane Collaboration criteria, consolidates current understanding of the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of nanoparticles, focusing on factors that affect their pharmacokinetic characteristics and translational challenges. In this review, we look at the latest improvements in how PNPs are made and used, as well as how they spread in the body for toxicology, medicine, and pharmaceutical uses, using different organic materials like biopolymers, synthetic polymers, inorganic compounds, and new composite systems that can repair themselves. The different types of formulations can be effectively developed to address issues related to creating new organic materials that are large, hard for cells to take in, and not very compatible with the body. The guidelines used in this study are those from PRISMA, Overall, we found 144 scientific studies. Rounding up, 41 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria were assessed to check for possible biases. As we concluded These NP pharmacokinetic events are fundamentally related to NP design. A practical understanding and control of NP design parameters is likely to pave the path for designing successful NPs. This article suggests that having a clear understanding and control of NP design factors can help move NP-based treatments closer to being used in hospitals. We present the NP design parameter problem as follows: We ‘predict as a feasible range’ the pharmacokinetic landscape of a synthesised NP platform containing design parameters from historical datasets of NP anatomical distributions.
Keywords:
Bio-Interactions Clinical Translation Dimensionality Reduction Drug Delivery In Vitro Assay Platforms Nanomedicine Nanoparticle Design Parameters Nanoparticles Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Nanoparticles
Article information
Journal
Journal of Medical Science, Biology, and Chemistry
Volume (Issue)
2(1), (2025)
Pages
130-148
Published
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 Sarhan Rashid, Asmaa Khadhim Chafla (Author)
Open access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Aillon, K. L., Xie, Y., El-Gendy, N., Berkland, C. J., & Forrest, M. L. (2009). Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 61(6), 457–466.
Ait-Oudhia, S., Mager, D. E., & Straubinger, R. M. (2014). Application of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis to the development of liposomal formulations for oncology. Pharmaceutics, 6(1), 137–174.
Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2013). Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 65(1), 36–48.
Arias-Alpizar, G., Kong, L., Vlieg, R. C., Rabe, A., Papadopoulou, P., Meijer, M. S., Bonnet, S., Vogel, S., van Noort, J., Kros, A., & Campbell, F. (2020). Light-triggered switching of liposome surface charge directs delivery of membrane impermeable payloads in vivo. Nature communications, 11(1), 3638.
Chen, Y., & Liu, L. (2021). Nanoparticle biodistribution and clearance: Implications for toxicity and efficacy. Toxicology Research, 10(3), 263–278.
Cheng, Y. H., He, C., Riviere, J. E., Monteiro-Riviere, N. A., & Lin, Z. (2020). Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Delivery to Tumors Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Approach. ACS nano, 14(3), 3075–3095.
Choi, H. S., Liu, W., Misra, P., et al. (2007). Renal clearance of nanoparticles. Nature Biotechnology, 25(10), 1165–1170.
Danhier, F., Feron, O., & Préat, V. (2012). To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, 148(2), 135–146.
Dawidczyk, C. M., Russell, L. M., & Searson, P. C. (2014). Nanomedicines for cancer therapy: state-of-the-art and limitations to pre-clinical studies that hinder future developments. Frontiers in chemistry, 2, 69.
Drozdov, A. S., Nikitin, P. I., & Rozenberg, J. M. (2021). Systematic Review of Cancer Targeting by Nanoparticles Revealed a Global Association between Accumulation in Tumors and Spleen. International journal of molecular sciences, 22(23), 13011.
Ejigah, V., Owoseni, O., Bataille-Backer, P., Ogundipe, O. D., Fisusi, F. A., & Adesina, S. K. (2022). Approaches to Improve Macromolecule and Nanoparticle Accumulation in the Tumor Microenvironment by the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect. Polymers, 14(13), 2601.
El-Sayed, M. A., & Huang, X. (2018). Pharmacokinetic aspects of gold nanoparticles in drug delivery. ACS Nano, 12(3), 2982–2993.
Feng, J., Markwalter, C. E., Tian, C., Armstrong, M., & Prud’homme, R. K. (2019). Translational formulation of nanoparticle therapeutics from laboratory discovery to clinical scale. Journal of translational medicine, 17(1), 200.
Garcia, M., & Rodriguez, P. (2020). Impact of surface charge on nanoparticle biodistribution. Nanotoxicology, 14(7), 882–896.
Guo, S., Liang, Y., Liu, L., Yin, M., Wang, A., Sun, K., Li, Y., & Shi, Y. (2021). Research on the fate of polymeric nanoparticles in the process of the intestinal absorption based on model nanoparticles with various characteristics: size, surface charge and pro-hydrophobics. Journal of nanobiotechnology, 19(1), 32.
Gupta, A., Dubey, S., & Mishra, M. (2018). Unique Structures, Properties and Applications of Dendrimers. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 8(6-s), 328-339.
Hauser, M., & Nowack, B. (2019). Meta-Analysis of Pharmacokinetic Studies of Nanobiomaterials for the Prediction of Excretion Depending on Particle Characteristics. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 7, 405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00405
Khan, I., Saeed, K., & Khan, I. (2019). Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 12(7), 908–931.
Khatra, D. S., Harikumar, S. L., & Nirmala, N. (2013). Nanoparticles: An Overview. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 3(2).
Korsmeyer R. (2016). Critical questions in development of targeted nanoparticle therapeutics. Regenerative biomaterials, 3(2), 143–147.
Kumar, R., & Lee, S. H. (2020). Nanoparticle-protein interactions and their effect on pharmacokinetics. Chemical Reviews, 120(11), 5117–5145.
Kumari, A., & Yadav, S. K. (2011). Cellular interactions of therapeutically delivered nanoparticles. Expert opinion on drug delivery, 8(2), 141–151.
Lagarrigue, P., Moncalvo, F., & Cellesi, F. (2022). Non-spherical Polymeric Nanocarriers for Therapeutics: The Effect of Shape on Biological Systems and Drug Delivery Properties. Pharmaceutics, 15(1), 32.
Liu, R., Jiang, W., & Li, C. (2019). The effect of surface charge on cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanoparticles. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 173, 263–268.
Miller, M. A., & Weissleder, R. (2017). Nanoparticles for imaging and therapy. Chemical Reviews, 117(19), 12732–12764.
Mostafalou, S., Mohammadi, H., Ramazani, A., & Abdollahi, M. (2013). Different biokinetics of nanomedicines linking to their toxicity; an overview. Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 21(1), 14.
Naahidi, S., Jafari, M., & Edalat, F. (2017). Biocompatibility of engineered nanoparticles for drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, 241, 1–14.
Nagpal, S., Png Yi Jie, J., Malinovskaya, J., Kovshova, T., Jain, P., Naik, S., Khopade, A., Bhowmick, S., Shahi, P., Chakra, A., Bhokari, A., Shah, V., Gelperina, S., & Wacker, M. G. (2024). A Design-Conversed Strategy Establishes the Performance Safe Space for Doxorubicin Nanosimilars. ACS nano, 18(8), 6162–6175.
Nguyen, T., & Lee, S. (2022). Nanoparticle interaction with the immune system: Pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, 44(1), 45–56.
O’Connor, C., & Walsh, J. (2020). PEGylation strategies for nanoparticle drug delivery: Pharmacokinetic benefits and challenges. Pharmaceutical Research, 37(8), 147.
P. Caron, W. (2013). The Mononuclear Phagocyte System as a Phenotypic Probe for Nanoparticle Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Preclinical and Clinical Systems Development of a Phenotypic Probe to Individualize Nanoparticle Therapy. Dissertation, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. USA.
Patel, R., & Shah, V. (2017). Impact of nanoparticle size on renal clearance and biodistribution. Nanomedicine, 13(6), 1875–1887.
Peer, D., Karp, J. M., & Hong, S. (2020). Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nature Nanotechnology, 2(12), 751–760.
Ramos, T. I., Villacis-Aguirre, C. A., López-Aguilar, K. V., Santiago Padilla, L., Altamirano, C., Toledo, J. R., & Santiago Vispo, N. (2022). The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Human Therapeutic Nanoparticle Development. Pharmaceutics, 14(2), 247.
Singh, R., & Lillard, J. W. (2009). Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Experimental and Molecular Pathology, 86(3), 215–223.
Tenzer, S., Docter, D., & Kuharev, J. (2013). Rapid formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology. Nature Nanotechnology, 8(10), 772–781.
Torchilin, V. P. (2014). Multifunctional, stimuli-sensitive nanoparticulate systems for drug delivery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 13(11), 813–827.
Wang, H., & Chen, Y. (2020). Pharmacokinetic profiles of polymeric nanoparticles for cancer therapy: A review. Drug Delivery, 27(1), 1076–1088.
Yoo, J., Park, C., Yi, G., Lee, D., & Koo, H. (2019). Active Targeting Strategies Using Biological Ligands for Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems. Cancers, 11(5), 640.
Zhang, L., & Gu, F. X. (2008). Nanoparticles in medicine: Therapeutic applications and developments. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 83(5), 761–769.
Zhang, Q., & Lu, Y. (2016). Targeted delivery of nanoparticles for cancer therapy. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 11, 325–339.
Zou, Y., Gao, W., Jin, H., Mao, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Mei, D., & Zhao, L. (2023). Cellular Uptake and Transport Mechanism of 6-Mercaptopurine Nanomedicines for Enhanced Oral Bioavailability. International journal of nanomedicine, 18, 79–94.