Article section
Narratives of Technology and Livelihood Education Teachers in the Use of Authentic Assessment
Abstract
The study aimed to explore the narratives of teachers in the Philippine educational context. It focused on understanding the strategies implemented by teachers, the responses of students to strategy applied, the difficulties encountered by teachers, and how students responded to authentic assessment execution difficulties. By examining these elements through a phenomenological research design, this research interviewed 13 Junior High School teachers from the Division of Cabuyao. In order to select the right informants and participants for the study, the used of Criterion Sampling Method was utilized. This method is a subtype of Purposive Sampling Method used in research to select individuals based on specific predetermined criteria or characteristics. After gathering the data from the participants, a thematic analysis was done to ensure a comprehensive analysis. The inquiry sought to provide an in-depth analysis of the current state and challenges of authentic assessment in schools in Cabuyao, Laguna, Philippines. The findings revealed that teachers employed a variety of authentic assessment strategies aimed at fostering deeper learning and critical thinking skills among students. These strategies included performance-based assessments, project-based learning, and real-world problem-solving tasks. Students generally responded positively to these methods, showing increased engagement and improved learning outcomes. However, the study also highlighted significant challenges faced by teachers, such as limited resources, large class sizes, and a lack of professional development opportunities. There were also issues expressed in terms of curriculum alignment and support. These difficulties posed hindrances in the effective implementation of authentic assessments. While authentic assessment strategies offered the potential in enhancing student learning, their successful implementation requires addressing the systemic and individual challenges faced by educators. There is a need for increased support in terms of resources, training, and institutional policies to fully realize the benefits of authentic assessment. The findings underscore the importance of a supportive educational environment that empowers teachers to innovate and apply effective assessment methods that cater to the diverse needs of students.
Article information
Journal
Journal of Education, Learning, and Management
Volume (Issue)
1 (2)
Pages
27-40
Published
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2024 Hanna Claire O. Rosal (Author)
Open access
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Amoy, L. A. (2022). Technology and livelihood education (TLE) teacher’s professional development and the use of innovative teaching methods. International Journal of Science and Education, 1(1). https://nijse.org/index.php/home/article/view/1
Arnold, J. (2022). Prioritising students in Assessment for Learning: A scoping review of research on students’ classroom experience. Review of Education, 10, e3366. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3366
Auckaraaree, N. (2013). Developing pedagogical tools to improve teaching multiple models of the gene in high school (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison).
Basal, D. V. (2022). Instructional competencies of technology and livelihood education (TLE) teachers: Basis for a competency-based module. International Journal of Research Publications, 96(1), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP100961320222948
Beasley, L. (2022). Teaching in the gap: Understanding special educators’ experiences teaching in between education policies (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://indigo.uic.edu/ndownloader/files/36189654
Bragado, N. P. (2023). Performance tasks-enriched material in cookery 9 for enhancing the practical skills of students. International Journal of Social Science, Humanities, and Management Research, 2(9), 03. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2023.v2i9n03
Caione, A., Guido, A. L., Paiano, R., Pandurino, A., & Pasanisi, S. (2016). E-learning project assessment: A new approach through the analysis of learners’ posts on social media. EAI Endorsed Transactions on e-Learning, 3(9), e4-e4. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-4-2016.151152
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120-123. https://resources.nu.edu/c.php?g=1013606&p=8395539
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). Sources of evidence-of-learning: Learning and assessment in the era of big data. Open Review of Educational Research, 2(1), 194–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2015.1074869
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design (4th Ed.). https://us.sagepub.com/site/default/files/creswell_qualitative_inquiry_and_research_design_4e_comparing_the_five_approaches.pdf
Crockett, H. (2020). Activities and teacher practices for the high school dance classroom to promote the development of self-directed learners. https://hdl.handle.net/11274/12482
Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st century learning. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119210863
Department of Education. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 basic education program (DepEd Order No. 8, S. 2015). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/DO_s2015_08.pdf
Department of Education. (2020). Interim guidelines for assessment and grading in light of the basic education learning continuity plan (DepEd Order No. 31, S. 2020). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/DO_s2020_031.pdf
Fook, C. Y. & Sidhu, G. K. (2010). Authentic Assessment and Pedagogical Strategies in Higher Education. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.153.161
Gregorio, E. (2016). Technology and livelihood (TLE) instruction of technical vocational and selected general secondary schools in Catanduanes. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(1), 1–22.
Gulikers, J., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. (2006). Authentic assessment, student and teacher perceptions: the practical value of the five‐dimensional framework. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 58(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820600955443
Hart, J. M. (2020). Stakeholders’ perceptions of organizational goal attainment at the secondary school level through the lens of authentic learning theory (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://www.proquest.com/openview/d817383d8120bdd83652b7d30d7a4df7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 401–412). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_32
Kaur, K. (2024). Enhancing Real-world Language Skills through Clil: A Study on Language Mastery and Everyday Applications. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(10), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i101611
Koh, K. H. (2017). Authentic assessment. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.22
Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students’ beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031117
Ng, S. F., Che Hassan, N. S. I. ., Mohammad Nor, N. H. ., & Abdul Malek, N. A. . (2017). The Relationship Between Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: A Case of Students in a Malaysian Tertiary Institution. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 64–76. https://mojet.net/index.php/mojet/article/view/110
Noor, M., Yusoff, N., & Faiz, M. (2020). Challenges in using authentic assessment in 21st century ESL classrooms. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 759-768. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20546
Palm, T. (2019). Performance assessment and authentic assessment: A conceptual analysis of the literature. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.7275/8wgj-5046
Republic of the Philippines. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013 (Republic Act No. 10533). https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
Restiana, D. K., Rahayu, S., & Wahyudi, A. (2021). Implementation of Physical Education, Sports and Health Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic at Senior High School (SMA) 1 Banyumas. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 10(4), 350-355. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpes.v10i4.48682
Saher, A. S., Ali, A. M. J., Amani, D., & Najwan, F. (2022). Traditional versus authentic assessments in higher education. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(1), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.01.29
SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2020). Assessment systems in Southeast Asia: Models, successes, and challenges. SEAMEO INNOTECH. https://www.seameo-innotech.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Assessment-Systems-in-Southeast-Asia-Models-Successes-and-Challenges.pdf
Sewagegn, A. A. (2020). Learning objective and assessment linkage: Its contribution to meaningful student learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5044–5052. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081104
Torrato, J. B., Aguja, S. E., Prudente, M. S., & Ramos, R. P. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions on instructional leadership: Drawing implications for professional development program for instructional leaders. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 402–408. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.9.4.402-408
Swaffield, S. (2016). Multilevel leadership for assessment for learning, and the potential of critical friendship. In Leadership in diverse learning contexts (pp. 93–108). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-2830295
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2017). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396
Wu, D., & Chen, X. (2015). The study of mobile teaching system based on micro-lecture: JAVA flipped classroom for example. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 10(1), 191–198. http://doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2015.10.1.18
Yin, B., & Yuan, C. H. (2022). Blended learning performance influence mechanism based on community of inquiry. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2061912