Research Article

Policy and Regulatory Gaps in Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities

Authors

  • Joubin Zahiri Khameneh Department of Decision Science, Paul College School of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, USA

    joubin.zahirikhameneh@unh.edu

  • Fagbenle Emmanuel Department of Decision Science, Paul College School of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, USA

Abstract

US electric vehicle charging facilities are not keeping with demand even following the 5-billion federal investment in the program of the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. By mid 2025, there are only 57 charging stations across 15 states, in the rural regions the coverage is lower than 25 percent of what is required and out of every 5 chargers 1 fails because of mechanical difficulties or flaws in the equipment. The paper reviews the policy and regulatory loopholes that led to these failures based on a qualitative case study design that includes the analysis of federal and state policy documents, Government Accountability Office reports, Government Energy performance information and media coverage of January 2024 to October 2025. It is possible to identify three urgent issues identified in the analysis: allowing processes longer than one year to postpone the construction discourages private funding; lack of federal-state coordination leads to unspent funds and redundant effort; deployment serves the wealthy urban population most, and 94 percent of the rural counties do not have sufficient coverage of critical infrastructure, with low-income populations the most in need of community-provided charging. These delays are a result of inefficiencies in governance as opposed to technical constraints. This paper adds a Triple Vulnerability Framework that shows the interacting influence of environmental stress factors on institutions and social injustice as a determinant of infrastructure resilience. Among other suggestions, it indicates compulsory resilience auditing on federally funded projects, real time charger checking mechanisms, and documents financing structures to orient funds towards experiences that lack adequate services. These reforms are essential to enable the transition to electric vehicles to create equal transportation and energy disparities instead of bringing about equitable decarbonization.

Keywords:

Charging Infrastructure Electric Vehicles Equity Grid Capacity Interoperability NEVI Program Policy Gaps Regulatory Challenges Sustainability United States

Article information

Journal

Journal of Management, and Development Research

Volume (Issue)

2(2), (2025)

Pages

149-156

Published

30-11-2025

How to Cite

Khameneh, J. Z., & Emmanuel, F. (2025). Policy and Regulatory Gaps in Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Management, and Development Research, 2(2), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.69739/jmdr.v2i2.1236

References

Afzal, H., & Hawkins, J. (2024). Electric vehicle and supply equipment adoption dynamics in the United States. Energy Policy, 193, 114275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114275

Ashfaq, M., Butt, O., Selvaraj, J., & Rahim, N. (2021). Assessment of electric vehicle charging infrastructure and its impact on the electric grid: A review. International Journal of Green Energy, 18(7), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2021.1875471

Azhar, P. F. (2024). Evaluating the Relationship of EV Charging Station on the Uptake of Electric Vehicles—Implication of the NEVI Formula Program (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2412.03608

Brown, A., Cappellucci, J., Heinrich, A., Gaus, M., & Cost, E. (2024). Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Trends from the Alternative Fueling Station Locator: First Quarter 2024 (No. NREL/TP--5400-90288, 2447837, MainId:92066; p. NREL/TP--5400-90288, 2447837, MainId:92066). https://doi.org/10.2172/2447837

Bullard, R. D. (2008). Differential Vulnerabilities: Environmental and Economic Inequality and Government Response to Unnatural Disasters. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 75(3), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2008.0035

Cannon, T., & Müller-Mahn, D. (2010). Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change. Natural Hazards, 55(3), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4

Chandra, M., Busch, P., Parés Olguín, F., & Tal, G. (2025). Paths of progress: Forecasting global electric vehicle demand amidst demographic and economic growth. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 147, 104928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104928

Chen, B., Moore, A., Jia, B., Zhang, K., & Cao, M. (2025). Equity Considerations in Public Electric Vehicle Charging: A Review. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(10), 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16100553

Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards*. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002

Deb, S. K. (2005). Dye-sensitized TiO2 thin-film solar cell research at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 88(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2004.09.007

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543

Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/135581960501000110

Foley, A. M., Winning, I. J., & O Gallachoir, B. P. (2010). State-of-the-art in electric vehicle charging infrastructure. 2010 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2010.5729014

Fox-Penner, P., Gorman, W., & Hatch, J. (2018). Long-term U.S transportation electricity use considering the effect of autonomous-vehicles: Estimates & policy observations. Energy Policy, 122, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.033

Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2–3), 187–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00044-7

LaMonaca, S., & Ryan, L. (2022). The state of play in electric vehicle charging services – A review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, 111733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111733

Lee, D.-Y., McDermott, M. H., Sovacool, B. K., & Isaac, R. (2024). Toward just and equitable mobility: Socioeconomic and perceptual barriers for electric vehicles and charging infrastructure in the United States. Energy and Climate Change, 5, 100146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100146

Levinson, R. S., & West, T. H. (2018). Impact of public electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 64, 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.10.006

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2700–b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9(4), 438–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Martínez-Gómez, J., & Espinoza, V. S. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in Latin America. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(12), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15120583

Metais, M. O., Jouini, O., Perez, Y., Berrada, J., & Suomalainen, E. (2022). Too much or not enough? Planning electric vehicle charging infrastructure: A review of modeling options. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111719

Micari, S., Polimeni, A., Napoli, G., Andaloro, L., & Antonucci, V. (2017). Electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning in a road network. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.022

Morrissey, P., Weldon, P., & O’Mahony, M. (2016). Future standard and fast charging infrastructure planning: An analysis of electric vehicle charging behaviour. Energy Policy, 89, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.001

Müller, W., Leyer, M., Degirmenci, K., & Barros, A. (2025). Designing EV charging networks from a city perspective: A conceptual analysis. Energy Policy, 198, 114516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114516

Pearre, N. S., Kempton, W., Guensler, R. L., & Elango, V. V. (2011). Electric vehicles: How much range is required for a day’s driving? Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(6), 1171–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.010

Schwab, J., Sölch, C., & Zöttl, G. (2022). Electric Vehicle Cost in 2035: The impact of market penetration and charging strategies. Energy Economics, 114, 106263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106263

Singh, P. P., Wen, F., Palu, I., Sachan, S., & Deb, S. (2022). Electric Vehicles Charging Infrastructure Demand and Deployment: Challenges and Solutions. Energies, 16(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010007

Stenstadvolden, A., Stenstadvolden, O., Zhao, L., Kapourchali, M. H., Zhou, Y., & Lee, W.-J. (2024). Data-Driven Analysis of a NEVI-Compliant EV Charging Station in the Northern Region of the U.S. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 60(4), 5352–5361. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2024.3397641

Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster Governance: Social, Political, and Economic Dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37(1), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618

Varghese, A. M., Menon, N., & Ermagun, A. (2024). Equitable distribution of electric vehicle charging infrastructure: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 206, 114825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114825

Wisner, B., Gaillard, J. C., & Kelman, I. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. Routledge.

Downloads

Views

2

Downloads

7