Article section

Article title
Contributor
Abstract
About article
DOI
Citation style
Copyright
Open access
References
Research Article

Analyzing the Effects of Agricultural Productivity on Household Living Conditions: A Study of Chisamba District in Zambia

Authors

  • Rabecca Phiri Department of Social Sciences, Information and Communication University, Lusaka, Zambia

    rabecca.mukhill@gmail.com

  • Kelvin Chibomba Department of Social Sciences, Information and Communication University, Lusaka, Zambia

Abstract

Agriculture remains one of the most important activities in Zambia. Zambia remains vulnerable to unstable food prices and food insecurity despite competitive advantages such as abundant agricultural land and a generally favorable climate for food production. This research analyzes the effects of agricultural productivity on household living conditions. The research was addressed by the following objectives; To analyze the effects of agricultural productivity on household living conditions; To ascertain how improved agricultural productivity affects family investments; To assess how improved agricultural productivity improves household food consumption patterns. A sample of 50 respondents was selected from various farmers to help provide data. The research utilized both qualitative and quantitative methods, surveys and focus group discussions. From the findings on how Agricultural productivity improves income levels, 36% said increased yields lead to more crops, livestock and income, 28% said it leads to diversification of crops and livestock tapping into markets with higher demand, and 36% said it leads to creation of more jobs in the agricultural sector. The respondents were asked the types of investments they made with increased agricultural productivity and 34% invested in farm infrastructure, 30% invested in land expansion or improvement, 8% invested in research and development, 6% invested in value added processing facilities, and 22% invested in livestock. The farmers were also asked on the influence of agricultural productivity on nutritional quality of food consumption within the households. 28% said it leads to greater availability and access to a variety of food items within the household, 30% said it improves affordability of nutrient-dense foods for households, 22% said it may lead to greater processing and packaging of food products, which can result in loss of nutritional quality, and 20% said it leads to intensive agricultural practices associated with increased productivity which can lead to nutrient depletion in the soil which then impacts the nutritional quality of crops grown in these soils. The key findings also highlighted a diverse range of challenges faced by most small-scale farmers, including poor agricultural productivity/yields due to climate change, and poor investment patterns due to poor   yields. Despite the challenges faced, a good portion of respondents expressed satisfaction and fulfillment in their agricultural activities. This study shows the various coping mechanisms employed by farmers such as investments patterns, saving patterns, and irrigation practices. Preliminary findings suggested a significant positive correlation between agricultural productivity and household living conditions, with improvements observed in income levels, asset ownership, and food security. These findings hold crucial implications for policymakers, highlighting the importance of targeted interventions to enhance agricultural productivity as a means to improve household well-being and promote sustainable development.

Keywords:

Agriculture Agricultural Productivity Living Conditions

Article information

Journal

Journal of Agriculture, Aquaculture, and Animal Science

Volume (Issue)

2(1), (2025)

Pages

151-163

Published

08-05-2025

How to Cite

Phiri, R., & Chibomba, K. (2025). Analyzing the Effects of Agricultural Productivity on Household Living Conditions: A Study of Chisamba District in Zambia. Journal of Agriculture, Aquaculture, and Animal Science, 2(1), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.69739/jaaas.v2i1.346

References

Alene, A. D., Khataza, R., Chibwana, C., & Ntawuruhunga, P. (2013). Trends in agricultural productivity growth and competitiveness in East and Central Africa. World Bank Group.

Arslan, A., McCarthy, N., Liper, L., Arsfaw, S., & Cattaneo, A. (2013). Adoption and impact of agricultural practices in low-income countries, Evidence from micro-level data. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

Ball. E., Fuglie. O. K., & MacDonald. J. M. (2007). Productivity Growth in US Agriculture. USDA, ERS, USA.

Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2016). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education.

Bergquist, L. F., Faber, B., Fally, T., Hoelzlein, M., Miguel, E., & Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2022). Scaling Agricultural policy interventions. Working Paper.

Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2008). Research in Education (10th ed.). Pearson Education, MA: Boston.

Brink, H. I. (1996). Fundamentals of Research Methodology for Health Care Professional. Juta and Company Ltd.

Brown, L. R. (1970). Seeds of Change: The Green Revolution and Development in the 1970s. Praeger Publishers.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Castañeda, A., Doan, D., Newhouse, D., Nguyen, M. C., Uematsu, H., & Azevedo, J. P. (2016). Who are the Poor in the Developing World? Policy Research Working Paper No. 7844. The World Bank.

Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005).An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer Science and Business Media Inc., Boston, MA.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Pearson Education, Inc., Boston.

Darku, A., & Malla, S. (2010). Agricultural productivity growth in Canada: Concepts and evidences. Canadian Agricultural Innovation Research Network (CAIRN) Policy Briefs, Saskatoon, SK.

Darku, A. B., Malla, S., & Tran, K. C. (2010). Agricultural productivity: What does the evidence say? Department of Economics, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1998). Farm productivity and rural poverty in India. The Journal of Development Studies, 34(4), 62-85.

Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1999). When Is Growth Pro-Poor? Evidence from the Diverse Experiences of India’s States. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Fuglie. K. O., & Wang. S. L. (2012). Productivity Growth in Global Agriculture Shifting to Developing Countries. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

Gollin, D., Parente, S., & Rogerson, R. (2002). The role of agriculture in development. American economic review, 92(2), 160-164.

Kemper, E. A., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Kraybill, D., & Mercier, S. (2019). How the United States benefits from Agricultural and Food Security in developing countries. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), USA.

Kristjanson, P., Radeny, M., Baltenweck, I., Ogutu, J., & Notenbaert, A. (2003). Livelihood mapping and poverty correlates at a meso-level in Kenya. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi.

Lewis, D. (2000). The Management of Non-Governmental Development Organizations. Routledge, London.

Loayza, N. V., & Raddatz, C. (2010). The composition of growth matters for poverty alleviation. Journal of development economics, 93(1), 137-151.

Mellor, J. W. (2001). Faster more equitable growth –agriculture, employment multipliers and poverty reduction. Agricultural Policy Development Project Research Report 4, Cambridge, MA.

Mozumdar, L. (2012). Agricultural productivity and food security in the developing world. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, 35, 53-69.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Acts Press, Nairobi.

Rimando, T. J. (2004). Crop Science: Fundamentals of Crop Science. U.P. Hosbernes, University Publication Office.

Robson, C. (2011). Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Ruttan, V. W. (1977). Induced innovation and agricultural development. Food Policy, 2(3), 196-216.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (6th ed.). John Wiley and Sons NJ: Hoboken.

Shultz, T. W. (1964). Transforming traditional agriculture. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Tembo, S., & Sitko, N. J. (2013). Technical Compendium: Descriptive Agricultural Statistics and Analysis for Zambia in Support of the USAID Mission’s Feed the Future Strategic Review. Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University.

Thirtle, C., Lin, L., & Piesse, J. (2003). The impact of research-led agricultural productivity growth on poverty reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America. World Development.

Tromp, L. A., & Kombo, D. K. (2006). Proposal and Thesis Writing: An Introduction. Paulines Publications Africa, Nairobi.

Udemezue, J. C., & Osegbue, E. G. (2018). Theories and models of agricultural development. Annals of reviews and research, 1(5), 555574.

World Bank. (2019). The world bank in Zambia: Overview. IBRD. IDA. https://www.Worldbank.org.

Zambian Ministry of Agriculture. (2016). Second National Agricultural Policy. https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/zam183104.pdf

Downloads

Views

21

Downloads

7