Article section

Article title
Contributor
Abstract
About article
DOI
Citation style
Copyright
Open access
References
Research Article

Assessing the Impact of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on Seedling Survival of Pinus brutia Ten. in a Semi-Arid Zone (Dohuk Region)

Authors

  • Munther Younus Mohammed Department of Forest Science, College of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

    muntheryounus@uomosul.edu.iq

  • Muzahim Saeed Younis Department of Forest Science, College of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq
  • Ammar Jasim Mohammed Department of Forest Science, College of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

Abstract

The process of natural regeneration in forests is crucial for the sustainability, growth, and stability of biodiversity. It is, therefore, a fundamental concern in forestry development. Natural regeneration is influenced by various biotic and abiotic factors. This study aimed to evaluate the survival and growth of Pinus brutia Ten. seedlings resulting from natural regeneration in uneven-aged mixed forests in Dohuk Governorate, located in northern Iraq. Field data were collected from 28 random samples during two inventory periods: the first in October 2022 and the second in October 2023. Data on tree and seedling species distribution within these samples were gathered and analyzed statistically to examine the relationships between the factors influencing the survival rate of Pinus brutia Ten. seedlings. The results indicated that the strongest biotic factors affecting seedling survival included the mean height of Pinus brutia trees, spacing between tree species, the number of all tree species, and the number of Pinus brutia mother trees. The corresponding correlation values were (-0.59), (-0.48), (0.3), and (-0.27), respectively. Among the abiotic factors, soil nitrogen content also had a notable influence, with a correlation value of (-0.33).

Keywords:

Biotic and Abiotic Factors Natural Regeneration Pinus brutia Seedling Survival Semi-Arid Zone

Article information

Journal

Journal of Agriculture, Aquaculture, and Animal Science

Volume (Issue)

2(1), (2025)

Pages

55-61

Published

11-03-2025

How to Cite

Mohammed, M. Y., Younis, M. S., & Mohammed, A. J. (2025). Assessing the Impact of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on Seedling Survival of Pinus brutia Ten. in a Semi-Arid Zone (Dohuk Region). Journal of Agriculture, Aquaculture, and Animal Science, 2(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.69739/jaaas.v2i1.356

References

Abdullah, M. O., & Mohammad, M. Y. (2018). Effect of Organic Fertilizer Pow Humus and Two Seaweed Extracts Hypra Tonic and Alga 300 on Growth of Pinus brutia Ten. and Pinus pinea L. Seedlings. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, 64(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2018.161456

Aber, J., McDowell, W., Nadelhoffer, K., Magill, A., Berntson, G., Kamakea, M., McNulty, S., Currie, W., Rustad, L., & Fernandez, I. (1998). Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems: Hypotheses revisited. BioScience, 48(11), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313296

Aber, J. D., & Magill, A. H. (2004). Chronic nitrogen additions at the Harvard Forest (USA): The first 15 years of a nitrogen saturation experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 196(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.009

Al-Allaf, M. Y. S., Younis, M. S., & Mahmood, M. A. (2009). Yield Prediction Equation for Pinus brutia Ten. Plantation in Sinjar Region. Journal of Mesopotamia Agriculture, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2009.27417

Alday, J. G., & Martínez-Ruiz, C. (2022). Expansion of naturally regenerated forest. Forests, 13(3), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030456

Applied Remote Sensing & GIS Center. (2015). Mapping and estimating vegetation coverage in Iraqi Kurdistan region using remote sensing and GIS. University of Zakho.

Bobbink, R., Hicks, K., Galloway, J., Spranger, T., Alkemade, R., Ashmore, M., Bustamante, M., Cinderby, S., Davidson, E., Dentener, F., Emmett, B., Erisman, J. W., Fenn, M., Gilliam, F., Nordin, A., Pardo, L., & de Vries, W. (2010). Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: A synthesis. Ecological Applications, 20(1), 30–59. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1140.1

Buringh, P. (1960). Soils and soil conditions in Iraq. Ministry of Agriculture.

Burkhart, H. E., & Tomé, M. (2012). Quantifying stand density. Modeling Forest Trees and Stands, (pp. 175-200).‏

Canham, C. D., & Uriarte, M. (2006). Analysis of neighborhood dynamics of forest ecosystems using likelihood methods and modeling. Ecological Applications, 16(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1481

Clark, J. S., Beckage, B., Camill, P., Cleveland, B., HilleRisLambers, J., Lichter, J., ... & Wyckoff, P. (1999). Interpreting recruitment limitation in forests. American Journal of Botany, 86(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656950

Collet, C., Lanter, O., & Pardos, M. (2001). Effects of canopy opening on height and diameter growth in naturally regenerated beech seedlings. Annals of Forest Science, 58(2), 127-134.‏ https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2001112

Dey, D. C., Knapp, B. O., Battaglia, M. A., Deal, R. L., Hart, J. L., O’Hara, K. L., Schweitzer, C. J., & Schuler, T. M. (2018). Barriers to natural regeneration in temperate forests across the USA. New Forests, 50(6), 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-09694-6

Flinn, K. M., & Vellend, M. (2005). Recovery of forest plant communities in post‐agricultural landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(5), 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0243:ROFPCI]2.0.CO;2

Grubb, P. J., Lee, W. G., Kollmann, J., & Wilson, J. B. (1996). Interaction of irradiance and soil nutrient supply on growth of seedlings of ten European tall-shrub species and Fagus sylvatica. Journal of Ecology, 84(6), 827-840. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960555

Hammond, M. E., Pokorný, R., Okae-Anti, D., Gyedu, A., & Obeng, I. O. (2021). The composition and diversity of natural regeneration of tree species in gaps under different intensities of forest disturbance. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01269-6.

Latham, R. E. (1992). Co-occurring tree species change rank in seedling performance with resources varied experimentally. Ecology, 73(6), 2129–2144. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941461

Oliver, C. D., Larson, B. C., & Oliver, C. D. (1996). Forest stand dynamics (Vol. 520). New York: Wiley.‏

Pardos, M., Del Castillo, J. R., Cañellas, I., & Montero, G. (2005). Ecophysiology of natural regeneration of forest stands in Spain. Forest Systems, 14(3), 434-445. https://doi.org/10.5424/srf/2005143-00939

Piffer, P. R., Rosa, M. R., Tambosi, L. R., Metzger, J. P., & Uriarte, M. (2022). Turnover rates of regenerated forests challenge restoration efforts in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Environmental Research Letters, 17(4), 045009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5ae1

Pretzsch, H., Biber, P., Schütze, G., Uhl, E., & Rötzer, T. (2014). Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870. Nature Communications, 5, 4967. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5967

Rank, R., Maneta, M., Higuera, P., Holden, Z., & Dobrowski, S. (2022). Conifer Seedling Survival in Response to High Surface Temperature Events of Varying Intensity and Duration. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4, 731267. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.731267

Saeed, M., & Jasim, A. (2014). Distance-Dependent Competition Indices for Predicting Growth of Pinus brutia Ten. Trees in Zaweeta Region. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2014.88449.

Smith-Martin, C. M., Gei, M. G., Bergstrom, E., Becklund, K. K., Becknell, J. M., Waring, B. G., Werden, L. K., & Powers, J. S. (2017). Effects of soil type and light on height growth, biomass partitioning, and nitrogen dynamics on 22 species of tropical dry forest tree seedlings: Comparisons between legumes and nonlegumes. American Journal of Botany, 104(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1600276

Wedin, D. A., Reich, P. B., Ritchie, M. E., Siemann, E., Tilman, D., & Knops, J. M. H. (1997). The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science, 277(5330), 1300–1302. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5330.1300

Downloads

Views

13

Downloads

1