Article section
Development of a 21st Century Positivist Learning Scale in Mathematics (PLSM): A Likert-Based Instrument using Factor Analysis to Measure Undergraduate Students’ Learning Experiences
Abstract
This study developed and validated the 21st Century Positivist Learning Scale in Mathematics (PLSM) through a mixed-methods approach combining Exploratory Factor Analysis and expert validation. Conducted at Isabela State University-Echague Campus with 333 undergraduate students, the research identified 29 observable learning practices categorized into four reliable components (α=0.95): Active Note-taking, Note Reorganization, Self-Testing and Use of Technology, and Review Techniques. The scale demonstrated excellent psychometric properties (KMO=0.944, p<0.001) with a four-factor structure explaining 59.94% of variance. Expert validators (three PhD professors) confirmed the alignment of items with positivist principles of measurable learning practices. The PLSM bridges traditional study methods with modern technological approaches, offering educators a validated tool to assess evidence-based mathematics learning practices. The scale’s development process involved statistical validation and theoretical grounding, making it suitable for diagnosing learning strategy profiles and informing pedagogical interventions in STEM education. Future researchers can adapt the PLSM to assess students’ mathematics learning practices at specific universities or extend its application to K-12 education.
Keywords:
Factor Analysis Mathematics Learning Practices Positivist Pedagogy Validation
Article information
Journal
Journal of Education, Learning, and Management
Volume (Issue)
2(1), (2025)
Pages
234-246
Published
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 Reñel M. Sabanal, Julius S. Valderama (Author)
Open access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Acharya, B. R., Kshetree, M. P., Khanal, B., Panthi, R. K., & Belbase, S. (2021). Mathematics Educators’ Perspectives on Cultural Relevance of Basic Level Mathematics in Nepal. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 17-48. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.1.12955.17-48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.1.12955.17-48
Andal, S., & Andrade, R. (2022). Exploring Students’ Procedural Fluency and Written Adaptive Reasoning Skills In Solving Open-Ended Problems. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.53378/352872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352872
Asare, B., Natalie, W., & Yarhands, A. (2024). The Effect Of Using Technology In Teaching And Learning Mathematics On Student’s Mathematics Performance: The Mediation Effect Of Students’ Mathematics Interest. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4, em059. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14309
Bloom, A. (2020). Effect Of An Active Note Restructuring Intervention On Developmental Mathematics Students’ Test Performance. Retrieved from: https://shsu-ir.tdl.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5e71e317-c2ab-40ee-975c-411608712afb/content
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.100.3.363
Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. New York: The Flamer Press.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Hay, I., Stevenson, Y., & Winn, S. (2022). Development of the “Self-Efficacy-Effort” in Mathematics Scale and Its Relationship to Gender, Achievement, and Self-Concept. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED623688.pdf
Gurat, M. G. (2018). Mathematical Problem-Solving Strategies among Student Teachers. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(3), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2018.110302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2018.110302
Isabel, V., & Barbosa, A. (2023). Active learning strategies for an effective mathematics teaching and learning. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 573-588. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13135
Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborate studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
Mesa, V. (2010). Student Participation in Mathematics Lessons Taught by Seven Successful Community College Instructors. Adults Learning Mathematics. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068226.pdf
Odutayo, A., & Fonseca, K. (2023). Making Quadratic Functions Interesting: Students Teams-Achievement Division Instructional Strategy. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2024, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14092
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The How, Whom, and Why of Parents’ Involvement in Children’s Academic Lives: More Is Not Always Better. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 373–410. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4624903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430305567
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors Affecting Students’ Learning Performance Through Collaborative Learning And Engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Rambe, H., & Siregar, S. (2022). The Effect of Time Management on Student’s Interest in Learning Mathematics. Jurnal Basicedu, 6, 2295-2300. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2435
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
Sintema, E., & Mosimege, M. (2023). High School Students’ Beliefs about Mathematical Problem Solving: A Cluster Analysis. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1391467.pdf
Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Ulusoy, F., & Argun, Z. (2019). Secondary School Students’ Representations For Solving Geometric Word Problems In Different Clinical Interviews. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 7(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.328341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.328341
Wienecke, L. (2024). The Influence of Note-taking on Mathematical Solution Processes while Working on Reality-Based Tasks. https://doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-24974.