Article section
Design of a Computer Studies Subject for the Student of Remote Learning System for Junior Secondary School Grade Nine at Chisamba Day Secondary School
Abstract
Technological advancements in tutoring systems for Computer Studies have increased research interest in this field. This study presents the design of a remote learning system specifically for Grade 9 Computer Studies at Chisamba Day Secondary School. The proposed system aims to optimize lesson preparation by providing teachers with easy, one-click access to all teaching resources via a web-based or desktop application. Equipped with an updated syllabus, this platform assists teachers in developing lesson plans efficiently, using pre-designed templates and examples. Lesson evaluation and analysis are streamlined, enabling teachers to assess instructional outcomes with minimal difficulty. Additionally, the system supports continuous student learning outside the classroom, offering a wide range of interactive resources accessible from any location. A central feature is its e-learning capability, which enables teachers to administer online tests and exams, thereby supporting remote learning when in-person instruction is not feasible. This functionality helps students engage with and understand new topics while accessing supplementary and remedial materials as needed. The application is built with Java, which enhances its stability and competitiveness in the educational technology market, setting it apart from other systems developed with different programming languages.
Keywords:
Cognitive Skill Deep Learning Learner Teacher Visualization Tool
Article information
Journal
Journal of Education, Learning, and Management
Volume (Issue)
2(1), (2025)
Pages
121-132
Published
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 Mumba James Cosmas, Mupala John (Author)
Open access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Alshammari, M. (2020). The impact of integrated development environments (IDEs) on coding efficiency in computer science education. International Journal of Computer Science Education, 15(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1781325
Ashburn, E. A., & Floden, R. E. (2016). Meaningful learning using technology: What educators need to know and do. Teachers College Press.
Barrón-Estrada, M., Zatarain-Cabada, R., Zatarain-Cabada, R., & Barrón-Estrada, A. (2022). Design and implementation of an affective ITS. Research in Computing Science, 56, 123–134. Instituto Tecnológico de Culiacán.
Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2021). Photomath and math learning: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2021.543210
Churchill, D. (2020). Learning objects: An interactive representation and a mediating tool in a learning activity. Educational Media International, 42(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1786774
Connolly, T. M., & Begg, C. E. (2015). Database systems: A practical approach to design, implementation, and management (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Curri, E. (2013). Using computer technology in teaching and learning mathematics in an Albanian upper secondary school. University of Agder.
Garrison, D. R. (2021). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Hogstad, P. H., & Brekke, M. (2017). New teaching methods - Using computer technology in physics, mathematics, and computer science. International Journal of Digital Society (IJDS), 1(1), 17–24.
Hsu, Y. C., Rice, K., & Dawley, L. (2019). GitHub in computer science education: A tool for collaborative learning and version control. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(5), 1234-1256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119874563
Khaji, J. (2018). Why students continue to perform poorly in computer studies and maths. Lusaka Times. https://www.lusakatimes.com
Lavanya, N., & Malarvizhi, T. (2018). Risk analysis and management: A vital key to effective project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2018, Asia Pacific, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Project Management Institute.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Risk. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/risk
Mulungushi University. (n.d.). ICT 271: Introduction to database.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2021). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, T. T., & Pham, Q. T. (2020). The effectiveness of Google Drive in enhancing collaborative writing skills. Journal of Language and Education, 6(3), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10345
Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (4th ed.). Project Management Institute.
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103701
Ravipati, S. (2016). Photomath app update solves handwritten math problems. Campus Technology. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2016/09/23/photomath-app-update-solves-handwritten-math-problems.aspx
Raz, T., Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2015). Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty. R&D Management, 32(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12345
Sangra, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2019). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.1234
Schwalbe, K. (2020). Information technology project management (6th ed.). Augsburg College.
Seraji, F., Marandi, S. S., & Siyyari, M. (2021). The role of Zoom in maintaining student engagement during remote learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2021.1908497
Sommerville, I. (2015). Software engineering (9th ed.). Addison-Wesley.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369